Contributory and Comparative Negligence: A Reappraisal

Empirical Comparisons of the Contributory versus Comparative Negligence Rules

The liability rule traditionally used in accident law when both the injurer’s and the victim’s behaviour affect the likelihood of an accident occurring is the rule of contributory negligence. Under it, the injurer is liable for the full amount of the victim’s damage only if the injurer’s behavior is negligent and the victim’s behavior is non-negligent. If both parties are negligent, only the vi...

What Are We Comparing in Comparative Negligence?

CEREBRAL HYDATIDOSIS: A REAPPRAISAL

The remarkable evolution of surgical management of cerebral hydatidosis towards an earlier diagnosis and proper treatment is evident from this 22-year retrospective study of our experience with 19 cases seen at Shiraz University Medical Institutions. Both cases of iatrogenically-induced infected cysts were seen during the pre-CT era. The optimistic view of being able to remove all the cyst...

UNFAIR AND HARsH RESULTS OF CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE LIVES IN INDIANA : THE INDIANA MEDICAL MALPRACTICE SYSTEM AND THE INDIANA COMPARATIVE FAULT ACT

EUROPEAN REAL ESTATE SOCIETY BERLIN - JUNE 25TH TO 27TH 1997 Contributory Negligence Involving Overseas European Banks in Property Valuation Negligence Cases In The UK

This paper examines the phenomenon of cross-border property lending and examines a number of issues regarding lending procedures and decision making processes in the context of the relationship between lender and professional advisor. It commences by placing these procedures and processes in the context of the development of cross border European property investment and finance. The UK has been...